Home / Glossary / Permanent establishment risk
Models
Permanent establishment risk
Permanent establishment risk is the tax problem that a foreign company can look enough like it is doing business in the Philippines that the Bureau of Internal Revenue treats it as having a taxable presence. Hiring.
Also called PE risk
How it works
Treaties and local practice look at fixed place, dependent agents, and how core revenue work is done. A bookkeeper in Davao closing U.S. books is usually support. A Philippines-based closer who habitually concludes contracts in your name is a different fact pattern. EOR and genuine contractor structures are used to keep employment compliant. They are not magic against PE if the business facts are agency. Get a tax opinion when the seat sells, prices, or binds. Do not take it from a recruiter’s FAQ.
Example: you hire two SDRs in Manila who book and close using your paper, with authority to discount. Six months later a local advisor flags dependent-agent PE. The loaded cost of those seats was never the issue. The issue is income that now looks Philippine-sourced. Contrast: one EA who owns an inbox and never binds the company.
How it differs
Misclassification is a labor problem. PE is a tax problem. They can arrive together when you hire ‘contractors’ who sell. An entity you own makes PE explicit; you file. An EOR does not erase PE if the people are your agents.
Common errors
Assuming ‘remote’ means ‘no PE.’ Letting sales authority creep into an EA seat. Using a blog post as the opinion you would show a revenue officer.