Home / Glossary / Voice vs non-voice
Industry
Voice vs non-voice
Voice vs non-voice is the old BPO split between phone work and everything else - chat, email, back office, knowledge work.
How it works
Voice needs a tighter accent-and-noise bar and often live U.S. hours. Non-voice writing seats can live on Clock A overnight coverage. Alumni cross over; tests should match the channel you are buying. For a U.S. company hiring one Filipino teammate, write this into the brief, the employment contract, and the peso payroll file before the start date. Slack habits do not override the Labor Code, BIR, or NPC. If the local employer of record holds the paper, they run the statutory step; you still owe a clean operating definition so the seat does not fail in week three. Put a number on the example when you budget loaded cost, because a nameless allowance always returns as a December surprise or a missed SLA.
Example: voice seat: quiet-room plus live English. Research seat: writing sample only. Same country, different gates.
How it differs
Customer support can be either. Accent and register matter differently. Quiet-room test is for voice.
Common errors
Screening a writer with a call-center accent rubric.
In practice
Treat Voice vs non-voice as a week-one operating object. Use the sector fact as context for a slate, not as proof about one person. Headcount in the millions does not staff your Tuesday. Write an owner - founder, local employer, or worker - and a date you will look at it again: first cutoff, first holiday, or first miss. If nobody can show a contract clause, a payslip line, a calendar block, or a checklist box, you do not have voice vs non-voice yet. You have a conversation. Convert the conversation before the person starts, while changing the deal still costs a paragraph rather than a resignation. Re-read the worked example above against the actual hire in front of you. If the numbers in that example cannot be swapped for this seat’s pesos, hours, and start date, the brief is still unfinished.